John Heaton (jheaton) wrote,
John Heaton

Parks and Recreation

I'm finally caught up on Parks and Recreation, thanks in no small part to NBC's decision to stream all 22 fifth season episodes on their website. Thanks, NBC!

In general, I like it very much, but speaking as a former government employee there are some things that gnaw at me. The hiring practices, for one thing. Take the episode "Animal Control," for example. (Spoilers ahead, by the way.) At the end of the episode, after the Animal Control department is absorbed into Parks and Rec, Chris and Leslie appoint April the Deputy Director for Animal Control. That's not the way it works! Especially with a new position. You need to write a position description, and advertise it, and hold interviews, and only then can you actually hire someone.

Now, that same episode says that department directors are political appointees, nominated by one council member and confirmed by the full council. Which is weird for a municipal government, but OK. But Chris and Leslie explicitly say to April that deputy directors are not subject to approval by the city council, so she should have gone through a normal hiring process. They're at least consistent about it, at least; Andy and Ann got their jobs at city hall in much the same way. But I don't have to like it!

Another thing: it strikes me as wildly implausible that Leslie could continue working part-time for Parks and Rec even after being elected to the council. For that matter, it's unlikely that she could've even run for city council in the first place without having to resign from her government job. The Hatch Art prohibits government employees from running for public office if their position is supported in any way by Federal funds. Of course, the Hatch Act wouldn't apply if her position is funded entirely by municipal funds, but given how cash-strapped Pawnee has been in the recent past, how likely is that?

ETA: because I just saw it on Facebook and it's related to the topic at hand:

Tags: government, politics, tv: other

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • My tweets

    Fri, 18:10: Did I hear correctly that tonight's @ 1055triplem #FridayNightFlashback is to 2003? They just did 2003 not even three full months…

  • My tweets

    Thu, 18:50: If you enjoy clownishly incompetent lawyers getting smacked down by judges, this livetweet thread is a must read.…

  • My tweets

    Tue, 19:10: Sorry, @ Raising_Canes, if you wanted me to stand in a line that long, you should've arranged for it not to be in the 80s and…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.